01 / QUESTION
The question.
A local Laya/Qwen research track tested a short training segment and compared the resulting package with its earlier diagnostic screen.
02 / SETUP
How it was studied.
The 4 October 2026 screen used four trained correction cases with the original histories and strict whole-JSON scoring. It was a training diagnostic, not a held-out evaluation.
03 / OBSERVATIONS
What happened.
- All four requests completed, and the recorded raw answers were identical to the before screen.
- Two of the four answers met the exact, typed JSON correctness check. This small comparison did not show an answer improvement.
04 / EVIDENCE
Behind the result.
The Laya/Qwen post-v5 native transfer screen and its bounded read-only review, 4 October 2026. Original receipts are held locally and are not yet published.
05 / LIMITATIONS
What this does not establish.
Four training cases cannot establish held-out quality, general improvement, model equivalence or beta readiness. The comparison does not rule out effects on other prompts or under other conditions.